Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBakken, Bjørn Tallak
dc.contributor.authorHansson, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorHærem, Thorvald
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T08:16:18Z
dc.date.available2024-03-20T08:16:18Z
dc.date.created2023-10-05T08:38:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2023, 97 (1), 1-24.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-1798
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3123262
dc.description.abstractThe impact of intuitive and analytic cognitive styles on task performance is a much-debated subject in the scientific discourse on decision-making. In the literature on decision-making under time pressure, intuition has been regarded as a fast and frugal tool. At the same time, the heuristics and biases tradition sees intuition as a source of errors, implying that more analytic decision-makers are less biased and better performers. We conducted two studies of the effects of interplay between intuitive and analytic cognitive styles on decision-making in a simulated wicked learning environment. The results of the first study revealed that the high-performing individuals were those who exhibited a strong preference for both cognitive styles, as well as those who showed a lack of preference for both. Individuals with a strong preference for only one of the styles were outperformed. In the second study, we replicated these findings in a team context. Post-hoc, we found that cognitive ability correlated highly with performance for the two high-performing style combinations but not for the two low-performing style combinations. Our results indicate that flexible style preferences boost the effect of cognitive ability, while strong preferences for a single style may entrench even those with high cognitive abilities.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectanalysisen_US
dc.subjectcognitive stylesen_US
dc.subjectcrisis managementen_US
dc.subjectdecision-makingen_US
dc.subjectintuitionen_US
dc.subjectwicked learning environmenten_US
dc.titleChallenging the doctrine of “non-discerning” decision-making: Investigating the interaction effects of cognitive stylesen_US
dc.title.alternativeChallenging the doctrine of “non-discerning” decision-making: Investigating the interaction effects of cognitive stylesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 The Authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-24en_US
dc.source.volume97en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychologyen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/joop.12467
dc.identifier.cristin2181855
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal