Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHole, Åse Storhaug
dc.contributor.authorHaave, Hanne Marit
dc.contributor.authorHermanrud, Inge
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-14T12:51:01Z
dc.date.available2018-02-14T12:51:01Z
dc.date.created2017-09-21T09:50:46Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 18th European conference on knowledge management. 2017, 449-445.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2048-8971
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2484684
dc.description.abstractThe paper addresses the facilitation of experience based knowledge sharing through inter-organizational networking and dialog across the Nordic countries. Organizations nowadays look for ways to facilitate new thinking and innovation to develop their organizations. To stay competitive they need leaders and employees who assimilate, develop and share knowledge (Senge, 2006, Filstad & Gottschalk, 2011). Strategies on Knowledge Management therefore seem more important than ever. The Nordic Council of Ministers has initiated several development programs to meet both global, Nordic and national challenges concerning sustainability, citizenship, inclusion, togetherness and democracy. One of the Projects connected to these programs is “Transformative learning circles”. This paper focuses on the role of the facilitator in transformative learning processes in this network. Facilitators can apply different roles to activate groups of people to learn through dialogue. This include elaborating existing frames of reference to learning new frames and moreover transforming habits of mind and transforming points of view (Mezirow, 2000, Kitchenham, 2008). We examine how facilitators understand their roles as facilitators and what competences they consider as important for facilitating. A facilitator’s role includes both attitudes, knowledge and skills. Our empirical investigation uncovers that there is a delicate balance between leading the discussions and letting the participants run the discussions. The facilitator’s work is a kind of invisible when things work out well, but it becomes more obvious if they fail. Research methods were individual interviews, focus group interviews, observation of physical meetings and net meetings. By triangulating different qualitative methods, we consider the validity of the data to be satisfactory (Lincoln & Guba, 1994).nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjecttransformative learningnb_NO
dc.subjectfacilitator rolenb_NO
dc.subjectadult learningnb_NO
dc.subjecttransformative entrepreneurshipnb_NO
dc.subjectknowledge creationnb_NO
dc.titleInvisible work, making visible differences. Facilitating transformative learning circles.nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber449-445nb_NO
dc.source.journalProceedings of the 18th European conference on knowledge managementnb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1496186
cristin.unitcode209,98,60,1
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for organisasjons- og ledelsesfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal