Show simple item record

Can trackers count free-ranging wildlife as effectively and efficiently as conventional aerial survey and distance sampling? Implications for citizen science in the Kalahari, Botswana

dc.contributor.authorKeeping, Derek
dc.contributor.authorBurger, Julia H
dc.contributor.authorKeitsile, Amo O
dc.contributor.authorGielen, Marie-Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorMudongo, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorWallgren, Märtha
dc.contributor.authorSkarpe, Christina
dc.contributor.authorFoote, A Lee
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-21T12:41:19Z
dc.date.available2019-01-21T12:41:19Z
dc.date.created2018-09-07T14:09:24Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBiological Conservation. 2018, 223 156-169.
dc.identifier.issn0006-3207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2581544
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleCan trackers count free-ranging wildlife as effectively and efficiently as conventional aerial survey and distance sampling? Implications for citizen science in the Kalahari, Botswana
dc.title.alternativeCan trackers count free-ranging wildlife as effectively and efficiently as conventional aerial survey and distance sampling? Implications for citizen science in the Kalahari, Botswana
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber156-169
dc.source.volume223
dc.source.journalBiological Conservation
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.027
dc.identifier.cristin1607672
cristin.unitcode209,98,55,2
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for skog- og utmarksfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S0006320717317780-main.pdf
Size:
2.064Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record