Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMöller, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorAlfredsson-Olsson, Eva
dc.contributor.authorEricsson, Birgitta
dc.contributor.authorOvervåg, Kjell
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-17T10:27:59Z
dc.date.available2020-04-17T10:27:59Z
dc.date.created2018-08-01T09:53:20Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationNorsk Geografisk Tidsskrift. 2018, 72 (4), 217-233.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0029-1951
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2651497
dc.description© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any wayen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the study was to analyse how cross-border commuting differed from intranational commuting in Sweden, and how cross-border mobilities affected spatial integration. The authors analysed patterns and spatial flows of cross-border commuting by comparing them with characteristics of intranational commuting. In the article, they explore the assumption that the border constitutes an ‘engine’ for work-related mobility, which affects processes of spatial integration in cross-border areas. The empirical material comprised data from surveys of commuting from the Swedish county of Värmland to Norway and commuting within Värmland. The findings showed that cross-border commuting shared common features with intranational commuting, including how the frequency of commuting was dependent on distance. The motives for commuting differed, and the reasons for working in Norway were economic rather than professional. In terms of spatial integration, cross-border commuting was mainly onedirectional, from Sweden to Norway, while leisure mobility and migration tended to be in the opposite direction. The authors conclude that the border region is characterised by integration through specialisation, which involves a permanent state of ‘transient’ mobility. Thus, a win-win situation can be distinguished, in which the border serves as a resource and an ‘engine’ for cross-border integration, mobility and economic activities.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectcommutingen_US
dc.subjectmobilityen_US
dc.subjectspatial integrationen_US
dc.subjectSwedish– Norwegian border regionen_US
dc.titleThe border as an engine for mobility and spatial integration: A study of commuting in a Swedish–Norwegian contexten_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber217-233en_US
dc.source.volume72en_US
dc.source.journalNorsk Geografisk Tidsskriften_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00291951.2018.1497698
dc.identifier.cristin1599269
cristin.unitcode209,6,3,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for reiseliv, opplevelsesnæringer og markedsføring
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal