Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFelipe-Lucia, María R.
dc.contributor.authorde Frutos, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorCrouzat, Emilie
dc.contributor.authorGrescho, Volker
dc.contributor.authorHeuschele, Jonna M.
dc.contributor.authorMarselle, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorHeurich, Marco Dietmar
dc.contributor.authorPöpperl, Franziska
dc.contributor.authorPorst, Florian
dc.contributor.authorPortela, Ana Paula
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Christian
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho-Santos, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorStritih, Ana
dc.contributor.authorVaz, Ana Sofia
dc.contributor.authorBonn, Aletta
dc.coverage.spatialEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-06T11:26:07Z
dc.date.available2025-02-06T11:26:07Z
dc.date.created2024-10-08T10:17:21Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationEcosystem Services. 2024, 70 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-0416
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3176599
dc.description.abstractProtected Areas contribute to the conservation of nature with associated cultural ecosystem services (CES) and values, such as recreational and educational opportunities, wildlife observation, scenic beauty, inspiration and sense of belonging. Informed management of Protected Areas needs to consider the distinct use and preferences for CES of different types of visitors to increase opportunities for nature experience while avoiding conflicts with biodiversity conservation. Therefore, it is important to understand the linkages between visitor characteristics and their demand for specific sets of CES, particularly in fragile mountain ecosystems. Here we do so by combining information from individual on-site surveys and participatory mapping of visitors in four European mountain Protected Areas. We analysed visitors’ frequency of use of eight CES and their socio-demographic information, identifying three clusters of visitors. We also assessed the spatial distribution of CES locations used by each visitor cluster. Our results highlight strong differences between clusters both in the most frequently experienced CES and in the spatial location where those CES were experienced. We suggest that a better understanding of visitors regarding the way they experience nature is relevant for the environmental management of mountain Protected Areas and their surroundings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectnature's contribution to peopleen_US
dc.subjectnature touristsen_US
dc.subjectnon-material NCPen_US
dc.subjectparticipatory mappingen_US
dc.subjectprotected areasen_US
dc.subjectstakeholdersen_US
dc.subjectsurveyen_US
dc.subjectCES useen_US
dc.titleDifferences in the experience of cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas by clusters of visitorsen_US
dc.title.alternativeDifferences in the experience of cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas by clusters of visitorsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2024 The Author(s).en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Landbruks- og Fiskerifag: 900::Landbruksfag: 910::Naturressursforvaltning: 914en_US
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.volume70en_US
dc.source.journalEcosystem Servicesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101663
dc.identifier.cristin2310378
dc.source.articlenumber101663en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal