Humoral and cellular responses to a fifth bivalent SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a prospective cohort study
Ørbo, Hilde Sofie Sager; Kasahara, Taissa de Matos; Wolf, Asia-Sophia Fumika Michaela; Bjørlykke, Kristin H.; Sexton, Joseph; Jyssum, Ingrid; Tveter, Anne Therese; Solum, Guri; Kjønstad, Ingrid Fadum; Bhandari, Sabin; Christensen, Ingrid Egeland; Kvien, Tore Kristian Aaserud; Lind, Andreas; Kared, Hassen; Jahnsen, Jørgen; Haavardsholm, Espen A.; Munthe, Ludvig Andre; Provan, Sella Aarrestad; Vaage, John T.; Mjaaland, Siri; Syversen, Silje Watterdal; Jørgensen, Kristin Kaasen; Grødeland, Gunnveig; Goll, Guro Løvik
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version

View/ Open
Date
2024Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Abstract
Background
As most people now have established hybrid immunity, the need for regular, updated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) is unclear. The study aim was to assess humoral and cellular immunogenicity of a fifth bivalent vaccine dose in patients with IMID on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).
Methods
In the longitudinal, observational Nor-vaC study, we assessed anti-spike and neutralising antibodies against Wuhan, Omicron BA.1 and BA.4, as well as frequency and polyfunctionality of responding T cells, following a fourth monovalent and a fifth bivalent (BA.1 or BA.4/5) vaccine dose in patients with or without hybrid immunity using TNFi.
Findings
Between December 17, 2021, and June 20, 2023, 456 infection-naïve patients with IMIDs using TNFi received a fourth vaccine dose and were otherwise eligible for inclusion. A total of 373/456 (82%) received a fifth vaccine dose, of these 190/373 (51%) had hybrid immunity defined as having had COVID-19 between the fourth and fifth dose. In patients with hybrid immunity, the fifth dose did not induce improved humoral responses compared to infection, neither with BA.1 (median anti-spike antibody concentrations 23,244 IU/ml (IQR 15,138–45,233) vs 36,341 IU/ml (11,887–53,710), p = 0.52) nor BA.4/5 (31,693 IU/ml (15,176–54,186), p = 0.30). Comparison of neutralising antibodies yielded similar results. In infection-naïve patients, a fifth BA.4/5 vaccine, but not the BA.1, induced slightly higher humoral responses (18,890 IU/ml (6494–50,211)) compared to the fourth dose (7304 IU/ml (3245–17,260), p < 0.0001). CD8 T cell responses remained stable following a fourth dose (median frequency of spike-specific cells 0.039% (IQR 0.010–0.14)), infection (0.058% (0.026–0.17)) and a fifth dose (0.058% (0.013–0.20).
Interpretation
In patients on TNFi with hybrid immunity, there was no immunological benefit of an updated fifth SARS-CoV-2 booster dose. Stable CD8 cellular responses following four doses indicate established protective immunity. Patients whose only risk factor is TNFi may in future follow vaccine recommendations for the general population.