• Good Guesses as Accuracy-Specificity Tradeoffs 

      Skipper, Mattias (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2023)
      Guessing is a familiar activity, one we engage in when we are uncertain of the answer to a question under discussion. It is also an activity that lends itself to normative evaluation: some guesses are better than others. ...
    • The Gordian Knot of Demarcation: Tying Up Some Loose Ends 

      Letrud, Kåre (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2019)
      In this article, I seek to improve upon a definition of pseudoscience put forward by Sven Ove Hansson. I argue that not only does its use of ‘pseudoscientific statement’ as definiendum inadequately address the theoretical ...
    • Scientific Progress: By-Whom or For-Whom? 

      Dellsén, Finnur Ulf (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2023)
      When science makes cognitive progress, who or what is it that improves in the requisite way? According to a widespread and unchallenged assumption, it is the cognitive attitudes of scientists themselves, i.e. the agents ...
    • Understanding scientific progress: the noetic account 

      Dellsén, Finnur Ulf (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2021)
      What is scientific progress? This paper advances an interpretation of this question, and an account that serves to answer it (thus interpreted). Roughly, the question is here understood to concern what type of cognitive ...
    • Unifying Epistemic and Practical Rationality 

      Skipper, Mattias (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2022)
      Many theories of rational action are predicated on the idea that what it is rational to do in a given situation depends, in part, on what it is rational to believe in that situation. In short: they treat epistemic rationality ...
    • Wise Groups and Humble Persons: The Best of Both Worlds? 

      Skipper, Mattias (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2023)
      This paper is about a problem that can arise when we try to harness the “wisdom of the crowd” from groups comprised of individuals who exhibit a certain kind of epistemic humility in the way they respond to testimonial ...
    • Would Disagreement Undermine Progress? 

      Dellsén, Finnur Ulf; Lawler, Insa; Norton, James (Peer reviewed; Journal article, 2022)
      In recent years, several philosophers have argued that their discipline makes no progress (or not enough in comparison to the ‘hard sciences’). A key argument for this pessimistic position appeals to the purported fact ...