Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHjertø, Kjell B.
dc.contributor.authorKuvaas, Bård
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-24T12:48:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationHjertø, K.B., Kuvaas, B. (2009). Development and empirical exploration of an extended model of intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management (20)1, 4-30en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/134198
dc.descriptionDette er post-print av artikkelen publisert i International Journal of Conflict Managementen
dc.description.abstractPurpose - The purpose of this study was to develop and empirically explore a model of four intragroup conflict types (the 4IC model), consisting of an emotional person, a cognitive task, an emotional task, and a cognitive person conflict. The two first conflict types are similar to existing conceptualizations, whereas the two latter represent new dimensions of group conflict. Design/methodology/approach - Based upon a heuristic distinction between cognition and emotion, the four conflict types are defined, and scales for measuring them are developed. The psychometric and statistical properties of the scales were analyzed by data collected from four company samples and two student samples (N = 208). The validity of the constructs was evaluated by comparing them with similar constructs, in particular, the Intragroup Conflict Scale (ICS), developed by Jehn (1995). Findings - A theory driven exploratory factor analysis elicited a 19-item structure of four reliable factors, representing the four conflict types. A confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated satisfactory properties of the data matrix compared with the proposed model. Furthermore, a refined 12-item scale was developed to consider the validity of the 4IC, with reasonably satisfactory findings. Research limitations/implications - Limitations concerning sample size, wording of items, the demarcation between conflict types and conflict approaches, and the robustness of the constructs are discussed. We suggest that researchers may find the model useful for future studies of conflict in groups. Practical implications - Our model may be of assistance in handling conflicts in organizations. In particular, managers and employees may become aware that emotional conflicts are not always associated with relational or person oriented issues; they may as well concern task oriented issues. Furthermore, cognitive conflicts do not always have to be task oriented; they may also concern relational or person oriented issues. The introduction of the emotional task oriented and the cognitive person oriented conflict types may thus extend the conflict management tool box for managers and employees. Originality/value - The results of this study challenge common use of emotional and relationship/person conflicts as interchangeable conflict types, and cognitive and task conflict as interchangeable conflict types. Accordingly, the study suggests new ways to understand conflicts in groups.en
dc.format.extent245614 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden
dc.relation.urihttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do;jsessionid=76DFA71FA6D58E33B5E3F0C65EF16D47?contentType=Article&hdAction=lnkpdf&contentId=1771226&history=true
dc.subjectIntragroup conflicten
dc.subjectemotionen
dc.subjectcognitionen
dc.subjectkonflikteren
dc.titleDevelopment and empirical exploration of an extended model of intragroup conflicten
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Psychology: 260::Cognitive psychology: 267en
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Sociology: 220en
dc.source.pagenumber4-30en
dc.source.volume20en
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Conflict Managementen
dc.source.issue1en


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel