Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChristiansen, Ola
dc.contributor.authorBratt, Ola
dc.contributor.authorHaug, Erik Skaaheim
dc.contributor.authorVaktskjold, Arild
dc.contributor.authorSelnes, Anders
dc.contributor.authorJordhøy, Marit Slaaen
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-03T13:13:54Z
dc.date.available2020-03-03T13:13:54Z
dc.date.created2019-07-03T13:58:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian journal of urology. 2019, 53 (4), 229-234.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn2168-1805
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2644969
dc.descriptionThe article has been peer-reviewed, but does not include the publisher’s layout, page numbers and proof-corrections.nb_NO
dc.descriptionCitation for the published paper: Christiansen, O., Bratt, O., Haug, E. S., Vaktskjold, A., Selnes, A. & Jordhøy, M. S. (2019). TECLA—an innovative technical approach for prostate cancer registries. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 53(4), 229-234. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2019.1634148
dc.description.abstractObjective: To present a code-driven, electronic database for patients TrEated with robotic-assisted radiCaL prostAtectomy (TECLA), developed at Innlandet Hospital (IH), Trust, Norway, for research, local quality control and to deliver data to the National Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN). Clinical data are directly extracted from the structured documentation in the electronic medical record (EMR). Materials and methods: The urological department at IH treats about 200 patients with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) annually. All consenting patients registered with the procedure code for RARP are included in TECLA. Clinical data are obtained automatically from the EMR, by structured forms. Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) are filled in by the patients on an iPad or a smartphone. Results: The basic construct of TECLA is presented. From August 2017 to June 2018, 200 men were treated with RARP, of which 182 (91%) provided consent for inclusion in the register. Of these, 97% completed the PROM survey before treatment and 91% at 3 months follow-up. PREMs were completed by 78%. All clinical variables for the hospital stay and for the 6-week follow-up were more than 95% complete. Conclusion: This entirely electronic surgical quality register is easy to use, both for patients and clinicians, and has a high capture rate. The data collection is linked to the clinicians’ workflow, without double data entry, so entering data does not add any extra work. The register design can be used by other hospitals for various surgical procedures.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.titleTECLA—an innovative technical approach for prostate cancer registriesnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionnb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber229-234nb_NO
dc.source.volume53nb_NO
dc.source.journalScandinavian journal of urologynb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21681805.2019.1634148
dc.identifier.cristin1709818
cristin.unitcode209,4,3,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for folkehelse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel