Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOgunbode, Charles Adedayo
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, Gisela
dc.contributor.authorCapstick, Stuart
dc.contributor.authorDemski, Christina
dc.contributor.authorSpence, Alexa
dc.contributor.authorTausch, Nicole
dc.identifier.citationClimate Policy. 2018.en_US
dc.description© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.description.abstractClimate change is projected to increase the frequency, intensity and unpredictability of extreme weather events across the globe and these events are likely to have significant mental health implications. The mental health literature broadly characterises negative emotional reactions to extreme weather experiences as undesirable impacts on wellbeing. Yet, other research in psychology suggests that negative emotional responses to extreme weather are an important motivation for personal action on climate change. This article addresses the intersection of mental health and functional perspectives on negative emotions, with a specific focus on the potential that reduced negative emotional responses to extreme weather may also translate to diminished motivation to undertake climate change mitigation actions – which we term the ‘resilience paradox’. Using survey data gathered in the aftermath of severe flooding across the UK in winter 2013/2014, we present new evidence indicating that self-appraised coping ability moderates the link between flooding experience and negative emotions and thereby attenuates the indirect link between flooding experience and climate change mitigation intentions. We conclude that support for flood victims should extend beyond addressing emotional, physical and financial stresses to include acknowledgement of the involvement of climate change and communication of the need for action to combat future climate risks. Key policy insights: - Psychological resilience to flooding and other extreme weather events can translate to diminished motivation to mitigate climate change - Negative emotional reactions need to occur at an optimal level to enable people to respond appropriately to climate risks. - Flood victims’ subjective appraisal of their ability to cope does not necessarily encompass consideration of the role played by climate change. Therefore, support for victims of extreme weather should include explicit acknowledgement of the involvement of climate change and the need for action to mitigate future climate risks.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.subjectclimate changeen_US
dc.subjectextreme weatheren_US
dc.titleThe resilience paradox: Flooding experience, coping and climate change mitigation intentionsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260en_US
dc.source.journalClimate Policyen_US
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for psykologi

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal