Scientific Realism in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Seven Sciences and History and Philosophy of Science
Peer reviewed, Journal article
MetadataShow full item record
Original versionPhilosophy of Science. 2020, 87 (2), 336-364 https://doi.org/10.1086/707552
We report the results of a study that investigated the views of researchers working in seven scientific disciplines and in history and philosophy of science in regard to four hypothesized dimensions of scientific realism. Among other things, we found (i) that natural scientists tended to express more strongly realist views than social scientists, (ii) that history and philosophy of science scholars tended to express more antirealist views than natural scientists, (iii) that van Fraassen’s characterization of scientific realism failed to cluster with more standard characterizations, and (iv) that those who endorsed the pessimistic induction were no more or less likely to endorse antirealism.
Available from 01.05.2021