dc.contributor.author | Su, Ming | |
dc.contributor.author | Lien, Gudbrand | |
dc.contributor.author | Korsæth, Audun | |
dc.contributor.author | Hardaker, J. Brian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-02-02T08:58:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-02T08:58:05Z | |
dc.date.created | 2019-12-17T11:16:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 2020, . | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1074-0708 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2725719 | |
dc.description.abstract | To support decision-makers considering adopting integrated pest management (IPM) cropping in Norway, we used stochastic efficiency analysis to compare the risk efficiency of IPM cropping and conventional cropping, using data from a long-term field experiment in southeastern Norway, along with data on recent prices, costs, and subsidies. Initial results were not definitive, so we applied stochastic efficiency with respect to a function, limiting the assumed risk aversion of farmers to a plausible range. We found that, for farmers who are risk-indifferent to moderately (hardly) risk averse, the conventional system was, compared to IPM, less (equally) preferred. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell-DelPåSammeVilkår 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | Comparison of Conventional and IPM Cropping Systems: A Risk Efficiency Analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 13 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2020.8 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1761755 | |
dc.relation.project | Norges forskningsråd: 244526 | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |