Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorThørrisen, Mikkel Magnus
dc.contributor.authorMørk, Gry
dc.contributor.authorÅsli, Lene Angel
dc.contributor.authorGramstad, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorStigen, Linda
dc.contributor.authorMagne, Trine A
dc.contributor.authorCarstensen, Tove
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Susanne Grødem
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Ted
dc.contributor.authorLim, Hua Beng
dc.contributor.authorFong, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorBonsaksen, Tore
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-23T12:58:13Z
dc.date.available2021-02-23T12:58:13Z
dc.date.created2020-09-30T11:05:49Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2020, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1103-8128
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2729836
dc.description.abstractBackground Productive approaches to studying (deep and strategic learning) are associated with a variety of favourable academic outcomes, and may be of particular importance for students in multifaceted and complex disciplines such as occupational therapy. Aim To explore associations between student characteristics and their dominant approaches to studying in two samples of occupational therapy students: a national sample of Norwegian first-year students, and an international sample of students in different year cohorts (Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and Norway). Materials and methods A total of 180 (national sample) and 665 (international sample) students were included in the study. Approaches to studying were measured with the Approaches to Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Data were analyzed with adjusted multinomial regression analyses. Results Age, gender and prior higher education were not associated with the dominant study approach. More time spent on independent study (international sample: OR = 1.07/1.08, p < 0.01/<0.001) and having current study program as the top priority line of education at enrolment (national sample: OR = 2.89, p < 0.05) predicted productive study approaches. Conclusions and significance Factors such as age, gender and prior higher education seem to be of limited importance for understanding students’ dominant approaches to studying.
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleStudent characteristics associated with dominant approaches to studying: Comparing a national and an international sampleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.description.versionacceptedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber12en_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/11038128.2020.1831056
dc.identifier.cristin1835397
dc.relation.projectUniversitetet i Stavanger: IN-11551
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel