Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPalmé, Anna E.
dc.contributor.authorHagenblad, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Svein Øivind
dc.contributor.authorAloisi, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorArtemyeva, Anna
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-16T10:09:55Z
dc.date.available2021-03-16T10:09:55Z
dc.date.created2020-10-08T20:44:07Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPlants. 2020, 9 (8), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2223-7747
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2733578
dc.description© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)en_US
dc.description.abstractAround the world, there are more than 1500 genebanks storing plant genetic resources to be used in breeding and research. Such resources are essential for future food security, but many genebanks experience backlogs in their conservation work, often combined with limited budgets. Therefore, avoiding duplicate holdings is on the agenda. A process of coordination has started, aiming at sharing the responsibility of maintaining the unique accessions while allowing access according to the international treaty for plant genetic resources. Identifying duplicate holdings based on passport data has been one component of this. In the past, and especially in vegetables, different selections within the same varieties were common and the naming practices of cultivars/selections were flexible. Here, we examined 10 accession pairs/groups of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) with similar names maintained in the Russian and Nordic genebanks. The accessions were analyzed for 11 morphological traits and with a SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) array developed for B. napus. Both proved to be useful tools for understanding the genetic structure among the accessions and for identifying duplicates, and a subset of 500 SNP markers are suggested for future Brassica oleracea genetic characterization. Within five out of 10 pairs/groups, we detected clear genetic differences among the accessions, and three of these were confirmed by significant differences in one or several morphological traits. In one case, a white cabbage and a red cabbage had similar accession names. The study highlights the necessity to be careful when identifying duplicate accessions based solely on the name, especially in older cross-pollinated species such as cabbageen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectBrassica oleraceaen_US
dc.subjectconservationen_US
dc.subjectdiversityen_US
dc.subjectgenebanken_US
dc.subjectplant genetic resourcesen_US
dc.subjectSNPen_US
dc.titleSNP markers and evaluation of duplicate holdings of brassica oleracea in two European genebanksen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber18en_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalPlantsen_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/plants9080925
dc.identifier.cristin1838334
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal