Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKhosrowjerdi, Mahmood
dc.contributor.authorBornmann, Lutz
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-08T07:29:11Z
dc.date.available2022-03-08T07:29:11Z
dc.date.created2021-04-19T14:29:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Informetrics (JOI). 2021, 15 (4), 1-15.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-1577
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2983599
dc.description.abstractNational culture is among those societal factors which could influence research and innovation activities. In this study, we investigated the associations of two national culture models with citation impact of nations (measured by the proportion of papers belonging to the 10 % and 1 % most cited papers in the corresponding fields, PPtop10% and PPtop 1%). Bivariate statistical analyses showed that of six Hofstede’s national culture dimensions (HNCD), uncertainty avoidance and power distance had a statistically significant negative association, while individualism and indulgence had a statistically significant positive association with both citation impact indicators (PPtop10% and PPtop1%). The study also revealed that of two Inglehart-Welzel cultural values (IWCV), the value survival versus self-expression is statistically significantly related to both citation impact indicators (PPtop10% and PPtop 1%). We additionally calculated multiple regression analyses controlling for the possible effects of confounding factors including national self-citations, international co-authorships, investments in research and development, international migrant stock, number of researchers of each nation, language, and productivity. The results revealed that the statistically significant associations of HNCD with citation impact indicators disappeared. But the statistically significant relationship between survivals versus self-expression values and both citation impact indicators remained stable even after controlling for the confounding variables. Thus, the freedom of expression and trust in society might contribute to better scholarly communication systems, higher level of international collaborations, and further quality research.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectKulturen_US
dc.subjectCultureen_US
dc.subjectPubliseringen_US
dc.subjectPublishingen_US
dc.subjectPåvirkningsfaktoreren_US
dc.subjectImpact factorsen_US
dc.titleIs culture related to strong science? An empirical investigationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Biblioteks- og informasjonsvitenskap: 320en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Library and information science: 320en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Biblioteks- og informasjonsvitenskap: 320en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Library and information science: 320en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-15en_US
dc.source.volume15en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Informetrics (JOI)en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joi.2021.101160
dc.identifier.cristin1905114
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal