Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFlagstad, Ingeborg Olsdatter
dc.contributor.authorHauge, Åshild Lappegard
dc.contributor.authorJohnsen, Svein Åge Kjøs
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T07:12:46Z
dc.date.available2022-06-28T07:12:46Z
dc.date.created2022-05-30T10:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3001187
dc.description.abstractThe importance of internalization and employee involvement in the greening of organizations is well-established; however, experiences of environmental certification processes in small-scale companies have largely been overlooked. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences of environmental certification in small-scale companies, and how certification may drive green change in these contexts. The study employed a qualitative approach and thematic analysis. Twenty-eight informants in seven small-scale companies were interviewed, via focus-group interviews with employees and leaders, and in individual interviews with leaders. The main theme that was identified from the reflexive thematic analysis was that certification gave rise to a back-and-forth process between drivers and hindrances, resulting in conflicting emotions and cognitive dissonance—which we denoted certification dissonance. Findings indicate that employees experienced conflicts between their own environmental values and the requirements imposed by the certification scheme. Four main categories of certification dissonance were identified: 1) Company characteristics, 2) the company's relationship with the customers/market, 3) characteristics of the certification scheme, and 4) emotional reactions. The participants struggled to choose between alternatives in different shades of green in what we denoted the ‘eco grey zone’. Systems theory and cognitive dissonance theory provided a theoretical framework for analysis. Based on our findings, we propose a new process model of certification dissonance outcomes. This model illustrates how employees and managers feel trapped within categorical thinking, and experience dissonance between the poles of ‘what is truly green and sustainable’ and ‘being certified’. This study may be of relevance to managers and stakeholders working on environmental sustainability.
dc.description.abstractCertification dissonance: Contradictions between environmental values and certification scheme requirements in small-scale companies
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132037
dc.subjectMiljøpsykologi
dc.subjectEnvironmental psykology
dc.subjectSosialpsykologi
dc.subjectSocialpsychology
dc.titleCertification dissonance: Contradictions between environmental values and certification scheme requirements in small-scale companies
dc.title.alternativeCertification dissonance: Contradictions between environmental values and certification scheme requirements in small-scale companies
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Organisasjonspsykologi: 268
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Organisational psychology: 268
dc.source.volume358
dc.source.journalJournal of Cleaner Production
dc.source.issue132037
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132037
dc.identifier.cristin2028030
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel