Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAngelstam, Per Krister
dc.contributor.authorAsplund, Brita
dc.contributor.authorBastian, Olaf
dc.contributor.authorEngelmark, Ola
dc.contributor.authorFedoriak, Mariia
dc.contributor.authorGrunewald, Karsten
dc.contributor.authorIbisch, Pierre L.
dc.contributor.authorLindvall, Per
dc.contributor.authorManton, Michael
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Magnus
dc.contributor.authorNilsson, Sten B.
dc.contributor.authorRoberntz, Peter
dc.contributor.authorShkaruba, Anton
dc.contributor.authorSkoog, Per
dc.contributor.authorSoloviy, Ihor
dc.contributor.authorSvoboda, Miroslav
dc.contributor.authorTeplyakov, Victor
dc.contributor.authorTivell, Anders
dc.contributor.authorWestholm, Erik
dc.contributor.authorZhuk, Alina
dc.contributor.authorÖster, Leif
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-03T11:57:54Z
dc.date.available2022-08-03T11:57:54Z
dc.date.created2022-05-06T14:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationForest Ecology and Management. 2022, 505 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-1127
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3009958
dc.description.abstractExpectations of what forests and woodlands should provide vary among locations, stakeholder groups, and over time. Developing multifunctional forests requires understanding of the dynamic roles of traditions and cultural legacies in social-ecological systems at multiple levels and scales. Implementing policies about multifunctional forests requires a landscape and social-ecological perspective, and recognition of both spatial and temporal features at multiple scales. This study explores the dissemination of even-aged silviculture in central, eastern, and northern Europe, and the consequences of choosing different vantage points in social-ecological systems for mapping of barriers, and to identify levers, towards multifunctional forest landscapes. Using a narrative approach, we first summarize the development of even-aged silviculture in four European regions. Next, we focus on Sweden as a keen adopter of even aged silviculture and identify levers at three groups of vantage points. They were (1) biosphere with biodiversity as shorthand for composition, structure, and function of ecosystems, which support human well-being at multiple scales; (2) society in terms of different levels of stakeholder interactions from local to global, and (3) economy represented by value chain hierarchies and currencies. The emergence of even-aged silviculture >200 years ago formed an expanding frontier from central to northern Europe. Sustained yield wood production and biodiversity conservation encompass different portfolios of ecosystem aspects and spatio-temporal scales. Ignorance and lack of knowledge about these differences enforce their mutual rivalry. An exploratory review of six groups of stakeholders at multiple levels in the traditional industrial forest value chain highlights inequalities in terms of distribution of income and power across different levels of governance. This effectively marginalizes other than powerful industrial actors. The distribution of financial results along the value chain is dynamic in space and time, and not all benefits of forest ecosystems can be measured using monetary valuation. There are also other currencies and incentives. A discussion of cultural trajectories in central and eastern European, Russian and Swedish forest management illustrates that forest history patterns repeat them-selves. Longitudinal case studies of countries and regions can help foster holistic multi-dimensional and multi-level systems thinking. Application of deep levers of change is likely to require external drivers. A key challenge is to handle the manufacturing of doubt and decay of truth, i.e., the appearance of alternative facts, and the diminishing role of evidence and systems analyses in political and civic discourses. This transition is fueled by new and rapidly evolving digital arenas.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectForest historyen_US
dc.subjectCollaborative learningen_US
dc.subjectHonest brokeren_US
dc.subjectLandscape planningen_US
dc.subjectLandscape stewardshipen_US
dc.subjectSystems-based thinkingen_US
dc.subjectTransformative changeen_US
dc.titleTradition as asset or burden for transitions from forests as cropping systems to multifunctional forest landscapes: Sweden as a case studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeTradition as asset or burden for transitions from forests as cropping systems to multifunctional forest landscapes: Sweden as a case studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume505en_US
dc.source.journalForest Ecology and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119895
dc.identifier.cristin2022211
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal