Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorStokke, Randi
dc.contributor.authorMelby, Line
dc.contributor.authorIsaksen, Jørn
dc.contributor.authorObstfelder, Aud
dc.contributor.authorAndreassen, Hege
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T13:24:32Z
dc.date.available2022-11-07T13:24:32Z
dc.date.created2021-07-12T14:57:43Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. 2021, 21 (1), 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3030466
dc.description.abstractBackground: In health care, the work of keeping the patient safe and reducing the risk of harm is defined as safety work. In our digitised and technology-rich era, safety work usually involves a relationship between people and technologies. Telecare is one of the fastest-growing technology-domains in western health care systems. In the marketing of telecare, the expectation is that safety is implicit simply by the presence of technology in patients’ homes. Whilst both researchers and health authorities are concerned with developing cost-benefit analyses and measuring effects, there is a lack of attention to the daily work needed to ensure that technologies contribute to patient safety. This paper aims to describe how patient safety in home care is addressed through and with telecare. We base our exploration on the social alarm, an established technology that care workers are expected to handle as an integrated part of their ordinary work. Methods: The study has a qualitative explorative design where we draw on empirical data from three case studies, involving five Norwegian municipalities that use social alarm systems in home care services. We analyse observations of practice and interviews with the actors involved, following King’s outline of template analysis. Results: We identified three co-existing work processes that contributed to patient safety: “Aligning people and technologies”; “Being alert and staying calm”; and “Coordinating activities based on people and technology”. Attention to these work processes exposes safety practices, and how safety is constructed in relational practices involving multiple people and technologies. Conclusions: We conclude that the three work processes identified are essential if the safety alarm is to function for the end user’s safety. The safety of home-dwelling patients is reliant on the person-technology interface. The efforts of care workers and their interface with technology are a central feature of creating safety in a patient’s home, and in doing so, they utilise a repertoire of skills and knowledge.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectCare worken_US
dc.subjectHome care practiceen_US
dc.subjectSafety worken_US
dc.subjectInvisible worken_US
dc.subjectSocial alarmen_US
dc.subjectTelecareen_US
dc.subjectWelfare technologyen_US
dc.titleA qualitative study of what care workers do to provide patient safety at home through telecareen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500::Medisinsk teknologi: 620en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-10en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Health Services Researchen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-021-06556-4
dc.identifier.cristin1921520
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal