A Review of Elinor Mason’s Ways to be Blameworthy

dc.contributor.author	Carlsson, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned	2022-11-17T12:20:47Z
dc.date.available	2022-11-17T12:20:47Z
dc.date.created	2021-11-25T11:05:02Z
dc.date.issued	2021
dc.identifier.citation	Criminal Law and Philosophy. 2021	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1871-9791
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3032436
dc.description.abstract	In this review, I summarize Elinor Mason’s Ways to be Blameworthy and raise some worries concerning three aspects of her book: her account of the knowledge con dition on moral responsibility, her notion of blame and its justifcation as well as Mason’s conception of extended blameworthiness.	en_US
dc.language.iso	eng	en_US
dc.rights	Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no	*
dc.subject	Mason	en_US
dc.subject	Blame	en_US
dc.subject	Responsibility	en_US
dc.title	A Review of Elinor Mason’s Ways to be Blameworthy	en_US
dc.type	Peer reviewed	en_US
dc.type	Journal article	en_US
dc.description.version	publishedVersion	en_US
dc.source.pagenumber	0	en_US
dc.source.journal	Criminal Law and Philosophy	en_US
dc.identifier.doi	10.1007/s11572-021-09585-6
dc.identifier.cristin	1958899
cristin.ispublished	true
cristin.fulltext	original
cristin.qualitycode	1

Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal