dc.contributor.author | Finbråten, Hanne Søberg | |
dc.contributor.author | Nowak, Peter | |
dc.contributor.author | Griebler, Robert | |
dc.contributor.author | Biro, Eva | |
dc.contributor.author | Vrdelja, Mitja | |
dc.contributor.author | Charafeddine, Rana | |
dc.contributor.author | Griese, Lennert | |
dc.contributor.author | Bøggild, Henrik | |
dc.contributor.author | Schaeffer, Doris | |
dc.contributor.author | Link, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Kucera, Zdenek | |
dc.contributor.author | Mancini, Julien | |
dc.contributor.author | Pelikan, Jurgen M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-24T08:30:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-24T08:30:12Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-09-20T12:42:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1661-7827 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3053751 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Sufficient communicative health literacy (COM-HL) is important for patients actively participating in dialogue with physicians, expressing their needs and desires for treatment, and asking clarifying questions. There is a lack of instruments combining communication and HL proficiency. Hence, the aim was to establish an instrument with sufficient psychometric properties for measuring COM-HL. Methods: The HLS19-COM-P instrument was developed based on a conceptual framework integrating HL with central communicative tasks. Data were collected using different data collection modes in nine countries from December 2019 to January 2021 (n = 18,674). Psychometric properties were assessed using Rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha and Person separation index were considered for reliability. Results: The 11-item version (HLS19-COM-P-Q11) and its short version of six items (HLS19-COM-P-Q6) fit sufficiently the unidimensional partial credit Rasch model, obtained acceptable goodness-of-fit indices and high reliability. Two items tend to under-discriminate. Few items displayed differential item functioning (DIF) across person factors, and there was no consistent pattern in DIF across countries. All items had ordered response categories. Conclusions: The HLS19-COM-P instrument was well accepted in nine countries, in different data collection modes, and could be used to measure COM-HL. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | The HLS19-COM-P, a New Instrument for Measuring Communicative Health Literacy in Interaction with Physicians: Development and Validation in Nine European Countries | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | The HLS19-COM-P, a New Instrument for Measuring Communicative Health Literacy in Interaction with Physicians: Development and Validation in Nine European Countries | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 19 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 18 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ijerph191811592 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2053481 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |