Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChristie, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-11T09:07:37Z
dc.date.available2023-04-11T09:07:37Z
dc.date.created2022-08-23T12:51:53Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Moral Philosophy. 2022, 125 (1), 1-20.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1740-4681
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3062302
dc.description.abstractWhat are the justifications and constraints on the use of force in self-defense? In his book The Morality of Defensive Force, Jonathan Quong presents the moral status account to address this and other fundamental questions. According to the moral status account, moral liability to defensive harm is triggered by treating others with less respect than they are due. At the same time, Quong rejects the relevance of culpability to the morality of defensive harming. In this article I argue that this rejection of culpability is unfounded and that Quong fails to establish his account as superior to the culpability account of liability to defensive harm.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectJonathan Quongen_US
dc.subjectQuong Jonathanen_US
dc.subjectliability to harmen_US
dc.subjectmoral statusen_US
dc.subjectrightsen_US
dc.subjectself-defenseen_US
dc.subjectculpabilityen_US
dc.titleMortal Mistakesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Rettsvitenskap: 340en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-20en_US
dc.source.volume125en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Moral Philosophyen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/17455243-20220002
dc.identifier.cristin2045313
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal