Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVerschoor, Mark
dc.contributor.authorAlbers, Casper
dc.contributor.authorPoortinga, Wouter
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, Gisela
dc.contributor.authorSteg, Linda
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-06T08:30:55Z
dc.date.available2023-06-06T08:30:55Z
dc.date.created2021-01-24T19:30:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Psychology. 2020, 70 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0272-4944
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3070066
dc.description© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. Dette er den aksepterte versjonen av en artikkel publisert i Journal of Environmental Psychology. Du finner den publiserte artikkelen her: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101435. // This is the postprint version of the article published in Journal of Environmental Psychology. You can find the published article here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101435.en_US
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding public attitudes to climate change and energy preferences is key to a successful transformation to a low-carbon society. While many studies have examined relationships between specific variables, little is known about the breadth of relationships between multiple climate and energy-relevant concepts. In this paper we used network models to explore and visualize relationships between climate change beliefs and energy preferences, using data from Round 8 of the European Social Survey (ESS8). ESS8 was conducted in 22 European countries and Israel. We found positive relationships between climate change salience, climate change beliefs, climate change concern, personal norm, and personal outcome expectancy, in line with prominent theories within the area. Moreover, beliefs on efficacy of actions of different actors (i.e., governments, large groups of people) to reduce climate change were positively related, and participants had consistent preferences for fossil energy sources or renewable energy sources, respectively. Furthermore, two types of energy security concerns could be distinguished, reflecting temporary and long term threats to energy security, respectively. Energy supply source preferences, energy policy support, and energy conservation behaviors were mostly not uniquely related to the other module variables. Furthermore, the relationships between variables, reflected in the network structure, were comparable across countries.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectenergy sourcesen_US
dc.subjectclimate changeen_US
dc.subjectpolicy acceptabilityen_US
dc.subjectvisualizationen_US
dc.subjectEuropean social surveyen_US
dc.subjectmethodologyen_US
dc.subjectcross-country comparisonen_US
dc.subjectklimaendringeren_US
dc.titleExploring relationships between climate change beliefs and energy preferences: A network analysis of the European Social Surveyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260en_US
dc.source.pagenumber49en_US
dc.source.volume70en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Environmental Psychologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101435
dc.identifier.cristin1877963
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal