Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDe Groeve, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorVan de Weghe, Nico
dc.contributor.authorRanc, Nathan
dc.contributor.authorMorellet, Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorBonnot, Nadège C.
dc.contributor.authorGehr, Benedikt
dc.contributor.authorHeurich, Marco Dietmar
dc.contributor.authorHewison, A. J. Mark
dc.contributor.authorKröschel, Max
dc.contributor.authorLinnell, John Durrus
dc.contributor.authorMysterud, Atle
dc.contributor.authorSandfort, Robin
dc.contributor.authorCagnacci, Francesca
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-14T10:32:58Z
dc.date.available2023-12-14T10:32:58Z
dc.date.created2023-02-14T12:25:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3107559
dc.description.abstractContext The Complementary Habitat Hypothesis posits that animals access resources for diferent needs by moving between complementary habitats that can be seen as ‘resource composites’. These movements can occur over a range of temporal scales, from diurnal to seasonal, in response to multiple drivers such as access to food, weather constraints, risk avoidance and human disturbance. Within this framework, we hypothesised that large herbivores cope with human-altered landscapes through the alternate use of complementary habitats at both daily and seasonal scales. Objectives We tested the Complementary Habitat Hypothesis in European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) by classifying 3900 habitat-annotated movement trajectories of 154 GPS-monitored individuals across contrasting landscapes. Methods We considered day-night alternation between open food-rich and closed refuge habitats as a measure of complementary habitat use. We frst identifed day–night alternation using the Individual Movement - Sequence Analysis Method, then we modelled the proportion of day–night alternation over the year in relation to population and individual characteristics. Results We found that day-night alternation is a widespread behaviour in roe deer, even across markedly diferent landscapes. Day–night alternation followed seasonal trends in all populations, partly linked to vegetation phenology. Within populations, seasonal patterns of open/closed habitat alternation difered between male and female adults, but not in juveniles. Conclusion Our results support the Complementary Habitat Hypothesis by showing that roe deer adjust their access to the varied resources available in complex landscapes by including diferent habitats within their home range, and sequentially alternating between them in response to seasonal changes and individual life history. Animal trajectories · Habitat use · IM-SAM · Resource composites · Roe deer · Sequential analysis methods · Spatio-temporal patterns · Vegetation green upen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectanimal trajectoriesen_US
dc.subjecthabitat useen_US
dc.subjectIM-SAMen_US
dc.subjectresource compositesen_US
dc.subjectroe deeren_US
dc.subjectsequential analysis methodsen_US
dc.subjectspatio-temporal patternsen_US
dc.subjectvegetation green upen_US
dc.subjectCapreolus capreolusen_US
dc.titleBack and forth: day–night alternation between cover types reveals complementary use of habitats in a large herbivoreen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Økologi: 488en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Ecology: 488en_US
dc.source.journalLandscape Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-023-01594-1
dc.identifier.cristin2125929
dc.relation.projectAndre: Funding was provided by Bijzonder Onderzoeks fonds UGenten_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal