Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSalvatori, M.
dc.contributor.authorDe Groeve, Groeve
dc.contributor.authorvan Loon, Loon
dc.contributor.authorDe Baets, Baets
dc.contributor.authorMorellet, N.
dc.contributor.authorFocardi, S.
dc.contributor.authorBonnot, N.C.
dc.contributor.authorGehr, B.
dc.contributor.authorGriggio, M.
dc.contributor.authorHeurich, Marco Dietmar
dc.contributor.authorKroeschel, M.
dc.contributor.authorLicoppe, A.
dc.contributor.authorMoorcroft, P.
dc.contributor.authorPedrotti, L.
dc.contributor.authorSigner, J.
dc.contributor.authorVan de Weghe, de
dc.contributor.authorCagnacci, F.
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-31T08:18:46Z
dc.date.available2022-08-31T08:18:46Z
dc.date.created2022-05-25T10:12:23Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLandscape Ecology. 2022, 37 1453-1468.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3014618
dc.description.abstractDiel use of forest and open habitats by large herbivores is linked to species-specific needs of multiple and heterogeneous resources. However, forest cover layers might deviate considerably for a given landscape, potentially affecting evaluations of animals’ habitat use. We assessed inconsistency in the estimates of diel forest use by red and roe deer at GPS location and home range (HR) levels, using two geographic layers: Tree Cover Density (TCD) and Corine Land Cover (CLC). We first measured the classification mismatch of red and roe deer GPS locations between TCD and CLC, also with respect to habitat units’ size. Then, we used generalized Least Squares models to assess the proportional use of forest at day and night at the GPS location and HR levels, both with TCD and CLC. About 20% of the GPS locations were inconsistently classified as forest or open habitat by the two layers, particularly within smaller habitat units. Overall proportion of forest and open habitat, though, was very similar for both layers. In all populations, both deer species used forest more at day than at night and this pattern was more evident with TCD than with CLC. However, at the HR level, forest use estimates were only marginally different between the two layers. When estimating animal habitat use, geographic layer choice requires careful evaluation with respect to ecological questions and target species. Habitat use analyses based on GPS locations are more sensitive to layer choice than those based on home ranges.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectHabitat analysisen_US
dc.subjectHabitat useen_US
dc.subjectHome rangeen_US
dc.subjectUngulatesen_US
dc.subjectGPS-telemetryen_US
dc.subjectMovement ecologyen_US
dc.subjectGeographic layersen_US
dc.subjectRemote sensingen_US
dc.titleDay versus night use of forest by red and roe deer as determined by Corine Land Cover and Copernicus Tree Cover Density: assessing use of geographic layers in movement ecologyen_US
dc.title.alternativeDay versus night use of forest by red and roe deer as determined by Corine Land Cover and Copernicus Tree Cover Density: assessing use of geographic layers in movement ecologyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Matematikk og Naturvitenskap: 400en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1453-1468en_US
dc.source.volume37en_US
dc.source.journalLandscape Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-022-01416-w
dc.identifier.cristin2027226
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal