dc.contributor.author | Sirnes, Espen | |
dc.contributor.author | Dinh, Minh Thi Hong | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-18T09:56:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-18T09:56:09Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-04-09T11:56:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2227-7072 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3032798 | |
dc.description.abstract | It is well known that intraday returns tend to reverse the following intraday period, conditional on excess buying pressure on the bid or ask side. This suggests that liquidity providers “overreact” to order imbalance (OIB) by initially altering quotes so much that a negative autocorrelation is seen in mid-price returns. We investigate under which circumstances this behaviour is most common. Specifically, it seems the tick size augments “OIB-reversal”. However, if the tick size is binding for much of the trading day, it has the opposite effect of censoring such reversals. In addition, if market liquidity is high, the reversal becomes more frequent. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | finance | en_US |
dc.subject | OIB | en_US |
dc.subject | order imbalance | en_US |
dc.subject | market microstructure | en_US |
dc.title | Tick Size and Price Reversal after Order Imbalance | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | International Journal of Financial Studies (IJFS) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ijfs9020019 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1903183 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |