Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSirnes, Espen
dc.contributor.authorDinh, Minh Thi Hong
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-18T09:56:09Z
dc.date.available2022-11-18T09:56:09Z
dc.date.created2021-04-09T11:56:39Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn2227-7072
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3032798
dc.description.abstractIt is well known that intraday returns tend to reverse the following intraday period, conditional on excess buying pressure on the bid or ask side. This suggests that liquidity providers “overreact” to order imbalance (OIB) by initially altering quotes so much that a negative autocorrelation is seen in mid-price returns. We investigate under which circumstances this behaviour is most common. Specifically, it seems the tick size augments “OIB-reversal”. However, if the tick size is binding for much of the trading day, it has the opposite effect of censoring such reversals. In addition, if market liquidity is high, the reversal becomes more frequent.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectfinanceen_US
dc.subjectOIBen_US
dc.subjectorder imbalanceen_US
dc.subjectmarket microstructureen_US
dc.titleTick Size and Price Reversal after Order Imbalanceen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Financial Studies (IJFS)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijfs9020019
dc.identifier.cristin1903183
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal